<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 736 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162136</link>
    <description>The High Court of Patna declined to entertain three writ applications challenging assessment orders under the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, citing the availability of appeal and revision remedies. Emphasizing the importance of exhausting alternative legal remedies, the court held that unless fundamental issues like jurisdiction or natural justice violations are involved, writ jurisdiction should not be invoked solely based on the existence of alternative remedies. The petitioners were directed to pursue appeals or revisions, with the court clarifying the setting aside of certain instructions by the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and rejecting bias claims based on those instructions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:10:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 736 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162136</link>
      <description>The High Court of Patna declined to entertain three writ applications challenging assessment orders under the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, citing the availability of appeal and revision remedies. Emphasizing the importance of exhausting alternative legal remedies, the court held that unless fundamental issues like jurisdiction or natural justice violations are involved, writ jurisdiction should not be invoked solely based on the existence of alternative remedies. The petitioners were directed to pursue appeals or revisions, with the court clarifying the setting aside of certain instructions by the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and rejecting bias claims based on those instructions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>