<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 561 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162126</link>
    <description>A taxing notification granting set-off for steel ingots, billets and rerollable scrap referred to in item 2 of the Third Schedule was interpreted to cover all scrap types listed in that item, not only a separately described rerollable scrap category. The court read the language and schedule structure as indicating a broader intended benefit, and held that any ambiguity in an exemption or set-off notification must be resolved in favour of the dealer. The set-off was also treated as applicable only where the goods had suffered tax at an earlier stage, supporting the assessee&#039;s entitlement to the reduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 15:35:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 561 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162126</link>
      <description>A taxing notification granting set-off for steel ingots, billets and rerollable scrap referred to in item 2 of the Third Schedule was interpreted to cover all scrap types listed in that item, not only a separately described rerollable scrap category. The court read the language and schedule structure as indicating a broader intended benefit, and held that any ambiguity in an exemption or set-off notification must be resolved in favour of the dealer. The set-off was also treated as applicable only where the goods had suffered tax at an earlier stage, supporting the assessee&#039;s entitlement to the reduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>