<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Carrier&#039;s Statement Retraction Deemed Afterthought; Coercion Allegations u/s 108 Require Magistrate Complaint.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17338</link>
    <description>Retraction of statement - Retraction was an afterthought. Had the Carrier given the statement under Section 108 of the Act under coercion he would have made complaint before the Chief Judicial Magistrate. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:57:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:57:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Carrier&#039;s Statement Retraction Deemed Afterthought; Coercion Allegations u/s 108 Require Magistrate Complaint.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17338</link>
      <description>Retraction of statement - Retraction was an afterthought. Had the Carrier given the statement under Section 108 of the Act under coercion he would have made complaint before the Chief Judicial Magistrate. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:57:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>