<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 756 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244162</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai upheld the tax liability on freight charges ranging from Rs. 750 to Rs. 1,500 incurred by a company engaged in sugar and molasses manufacturing. The company was directed to deposit Rs. 12,00,000/- within six weeks, with balance dues predeposit waived and recovery stayed pending appeal resolution. The Tribunal emphasized compliance with tax regulations for all charges, noted the importance of evidence, and reserved the issue of limitation for further review during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:11:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 756 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244162</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai upheld the tax liability on freight charges ranging from Rs. 750 to Rs. 1,500 incurred by a company engaged in sugar and molasses manufacturing. The company was directed to deposit Rs. 12,00,000/- within six weeks, with balance dues predeposit waived and recovery stayed pending appeal resolution. The Tribunal emphasized compliance with tax regulations for all charges, noted the importance of evidence, and reserved the issue of limitation for further review during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>