<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 754 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244160</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed the application for waiver of pre-deposit of the amounts involved and stayed the recovery until the appeal&#039;s disposal. The judgment focused on the issues of demand for a differential Service Tax amount based on eligibility for works contract services and notification benefit, as well as the delay in issuing the show cause notice, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s compliance with the law and raising questions about the timing of the notice in relation to the limitation period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:11:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346421" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 754 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244160</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed the application for waiver of pre-deposit of the amounts involved and stayed the recovery until the appeal&#039;s disposal. The judgment focused on the issues of demand for a differential Service Tax amount based on eligibility for works contract services and notification benefit, as well as the delay in issuing the show cause notice, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s compliance with the law and raising questions about the timing of the notice in relation to the limitation period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>