<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 730 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244136</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the show cause notice issued by the Commissioner of Customs, dismissing the petitioner&#039;s challenge regarding its jurisdiction and timing. The court emphasized that the show cause notice was for final assessment and classification, not a premature duty demand, and did not lack jurisdiction. The petitioner&#039;s concerns about the right to appeal were deemed insufficient to invalidate the notice. The court allowed the petitioner to address the proposed confiscation of goods and recovery of differential duty during adjudication but ultimately dismissed the petition, finding no jurisdictional issues or violations of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 17:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 730 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244136</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the show cause notice issued by the Commissioner of Customs, dismissing the petitioner&#039;s challenge regarding its jurisdiction and timing. The court emphasized that the show cause notice was for final assessment and classification, not a premature duty demand, and did not lack jurisdiction. The petitioner&#039;s concerns about the right to appeal were deemed insufficient to invalidate the notice. The court allowed the petitioner to address the proposed confiscation of goods and recovery of differential duty during adjudication but ultimately dismissed the petition, finding no jurisdictional issues or violations of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>