https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162101 In SAFEMA proceedings, a person may still challenge the underlying detention order where an earlier writ petition against that order was dismissed as infructuous without any adjudication on merits. The absence of a merits determination means the earlier challenge was not unsuccessful, and the affected person is not precluded from disputing the detention order when that order is a statutory prerequisite for SAFEMA action. The High Court was required to examine the validity of the detention order rather than refuse the challenge on the ground of delay or prior dismissal. en-us Wed, 22 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Jul 2014 09:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162101 In SAFEMA proceedings, a person may still challenge the underlying detention order where an earlier writ petition against that order was dismissed as infructuous without any adjudication on merits. The absence of a merits determination means the earlier challenge was not unsuccessful, and the affected person is not precluded from disputing the detention order when that order is a statutory prerequisite for SAFEMA action. The High Court was required to examine the validity of the detention order rather than refuse the challenge on the ground of delay or prior dismissal. Case-Laws FEMA Wed, 22 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162101