<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 725 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244131</link>
    <description>The article explains that refund of disputed excise duty cannot be denied on consumer pass-on grounds where the assessee consistently maintained a lower tariff classification and the record showed no recovery of the higher duty from consumers. The dispute concerned tyre cord fabrics and the shift from Heading No. 59.02 to Heading No. 59.09, but the decisive point was the absence of material proving that the excess amount was collected from buyers. On that basis, the consumer recovery bar was held inapplicable and the assessee was entitled to retain the refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 725 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244131</link>
      <description>The article explains that refund of disputed excise duty cannot be denied on consumer pass-on grounds where the assessee consistently maintained a lower tariff classification and the record showed no recovery of the higher duty from consumers. The dispute concerned tyre cord fabrics and the shift from Heading No. 59.02 to Heading No. 59.09, but the decisive point was the absence of material proving that the excess amount was collected from buyers. On that basis, the consumer recovery bar was held inapplicable and the assessee was entitled to retain the refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>