<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 716 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244122</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the rectification application, citing the absence of a demonstrable mistake in the previous order that warranted rectification. Emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal precedents and the limits on its power to review decisions without statutory provisions, the Tribunal concluded that no rectifiable mistake was evident from the record. Consequently, the application was denied due to the lack of a clear error in the record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 716 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244122</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the rectification application, citing the absence of a demonstrable mistake in the previous order that warranted rectification. Emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal precedents and the limits on its power to review decisions without statutory provisions, the Tribunal concluded that no rectifiable mistake was evident from the record. Consequently, the application was denied due to the lack of a clear error in the record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>