<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 694 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244100</link>
    <description>In a Cenvat credit dispute involving common input services used for taxable output services and trading activity, the Tribunal held that the denial of credit was confined to the proportion attributable to trading, which was not a taxable service during the relevant period. It found the cited High Court ruling inapplicable because the disallowance had already been made on a proportionate basis, and treated limitation as a mixed question of law and fact for final hearing. As no prima facie case for complete waiver was established, partial pre-deposit was directed, and recovery of the balance demand, interest, and penalty was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 08:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 694 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244100</link>
      <description>In a Cenvat credit dispute involving common input services used for taxable output services and trading activity, the Tribunal held that the denial of credit was confined to the proportion attributable to trading, which was not a taxable service during the relevant period. It found the cited High Court ruling inapplicable because the disallowance had already been made on a proportionate basis, and treated limitation as a mixed question of law and fact for final hearing. As no prima facie case for complete waiver was established, partial pre-deposit was directed, and recovery of the balance demand, interest, and penalty was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>