<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 681 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244087</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals) decision, confirming that the appellant, a credit cooperative society, was entitled to the deduction under Sec. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act. The judgment clarified the distinction between cooperative banks and credit cooperative societies for tax purposes, emphasizing that Sec. 80P(4) applied to banks and not credit societies. The ruling dismissed the Revenue&#039;s argument, affirming the appellant&#039;s eligibility for the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 06:39:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 681 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244087</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals) decision, confirming that the appellant, a credit cooperative society, was entitled to the deduction under Sec. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act. The judgment clarified the distinction between cooperative banks and credit cooperative societies for tax purposes, emphasizing that Sec. 80P(4) applied to banks and not credit societies. The ruling dismissed the Revenue&#039;s argument, affirming the appellant&#039;s eligibility for the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>