<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 673 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244079</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, quashing the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s order for exceeding jurisdiction in determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price and declaring transactions as sham. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled the reopening of assessment under section 147 for the earlier year invalid due to lack of new material and full disclosure by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 06:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 673 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244079</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, quashing the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s order for exceeding jurisdiction in determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price and declaring transactions as sham. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled the reopening of assessment under section 147 for the earlier year invalid due to lack of new material and full disclosure by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>