<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 659 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244064</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC held that reassessment proceedings under sections 147/148 cannot be initiated based on mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer. Where all facts were available during original assessment and queries were raised and replied to, the AO cannot reopen assessment without reasonable belief that income escaped taxation. The court emphasized that assessment orders need not contain detailed discussion of every query if the AO was satisfied with responses. The HC set aside the section 148 notice and reassessment order, ruling in favor of the assessee as the reopening was impermissible being based solely on change of opinion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 08:53:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 659 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244064</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC held that reassessment proceedings under sections 147/148 cannot be initiated based on mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer. Where all facts were available during original assessment and queries were raised and replied to, the AO cannot reopen assessment without reasonable belief that income escaped taxation. The court emphasized that assessment orders need not contain detailed discussion of every query if the AO was satisfied with responses. The HC set aside the section 148 notice and reassessment order, ruling in favor of the assessee as the reopening was impermissible being based solely on change of opinion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>