<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 658 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244063</link>
    <description>Section 10(23C)(iiiab) exemption requires an educational institution to be a university or educational institution, exist solely for education, not operate for profit, and be wholly or substantially financed by the Government. On the facts, Government grants formed only a minor part of the University&#039;s receipts, so the financing test was not met. The Court also applied the predominant object test and held that consistently large surpluses invested to earn interest showed systematic profit-making rather than a reasonable surplus. It further held that a statutory university is a distinct body corporate and not the State for article 289(1), so it cannot claim constitutional immunity from taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 658 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244063</link>
      <description>Section 10(23C)(iiiab) exemption requires an educational institution to be a university or educational institution, exist solely for education, not operate for profit, and be wholly or substantially financed by the Government. On the facts, Government grants formed only a minor part of the University&#039;s receipts, so the financing test was not met. The Court also applied the predominant object test and held that consistently large surpluses invested to earn interest showed systematic profit-making rather than a reasonable surplus. It further held that a statutory university is a distinct body corporate and not the State for article 289(1), so it cannot claim constitutional immunity from taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>