<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 656 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244061</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the disallowance of depreciation on the immovable property and the disallowance of salary expenditure. The Tribunal agreed with the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) that depreciation should only be allowed on the building, not the land, as per legal precedents. Additionally, the disallowance of salary expenditure was upheld due to lack of evidence for payments to employees. The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal on both issues, providing detailed legal analysis to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:45:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 656 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244061</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the disallowance of depreciation on the immovable property and the disallowance of salary expenditure. The Tribunal agreed with the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) that depreciation should only be allowed on the building, not the land, as per legal precedents. Additionally, the disallowance of salary expenditure was upheld due to lack of evidence for payments to employees. The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal on both issues, providing detailed legal analysis to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>