<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 655 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244060</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and upholding the AO&#039;s addition of Rs.20,00,000 to the assessee&#039;s income for the assessment year 2007-08. The court emphasized the necessity of providing evidence to support transactions and clarify the source of funds to prevent discrepancies and undisclosed income additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 20:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 655 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244060</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and upholding the AO&#039;s addition of Rs.20,00,000 to the assessee&#039;s income for the assessment year 2007-08. The court emphasized the necessity of providing evidence to support transactions and clarify the source of funds to prevent discrepancies and undisclosed income additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>