<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 649 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244054</link>
    <description>Consistent recognition of a tenancy in prior proceedings, together with the will and surrounding record, meant the estate&#039;s property could not be treated as self-occupied on the material before the ITAT. As the tenant&#039;s possession was established and the challenge to the lease arrangement could not be reopened in the present proceedings, the assessable rental income was confined to the actual rent received. No notional income on account of self-occupancy was justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:41:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 649 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244054</link>
      <description>Consistent recognition of a tenancy in prior proceedings, together with the will and surrounding record, meant the estate&#039;s property could not be treated as self-occupied on the material before the ITAT. As the tenant&#039;s possession was established and the challenge to the lease arrangement could not be reopened in the present proceedings, the assessable rental income was confined to the actual rent received. No notional income on account of self-occupancy was justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>