https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244053 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the exclusion of Motilal Oswal Investment Advisors Pvt. Ltd. as a comparable and inclusion of IDC (India) Ltd. in determining the arm's length price. The AO was instructed to reassess in compliance with Section 92C(2) r.w. Section 92C(2A), addressing specific grievances. The order was pronounced on 7th February 2014. en-us Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Feb 2014 11:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244053 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the exclusion of Motilal Oswal Investment Advisors Pvt. Ltd. as a comparable and inclusion of IDC (India) Ltd. in determining the arm's length price. The AO was instructed to reassess in compliance with Section 92C(2) r.w. Section 92C(2A), addressing specific grievances. The order was pronounced on 7th February 2014. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244053