<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 646 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244051</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the sum of Rs.One crore received under a Sale Deed should be treated as long term capital gain and not business income. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had adequately considered the issue, and there was no justification for the CIT&#039;s intervention under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s order and allowed the appeal by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 646 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244051</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the sum of Rs.One crore received under a Sale Deed should be treated as long term capital gain and not business income. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had adequately considered the issue, and there was no justification for the CIT&#039;s intervention under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s order and allowed the appeal by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>