https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244046 A 278-day delay in filing the appeal was not condoned because the explanation of internal scrutiny, administrative procedures and an uncommunicated committee direction did not amount to sufficient cause. The Tribunal held that these averments showed lackadaisical departmental handling rather than a bona fide or unavoidable impediment, so the delay could not be excused. As the condonation application failed, the appeal was dismissed as time barred and the stay application was also rejected. en-us Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:25:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244046 A 278-day delay in filing the appeal was not condoned because the explanation of internal scrutiny, administrative procedures and an uncommunicated committee direction did not amount to sufficient cause. The Tribunal held that these averments showed lackadaisical departmental handling rather than a bona fide or unavoidable impediment, so the delay could not be excused. As the condonation application failed, the appeal was dismissed as time barred and the stay application was also rejected. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244046