<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 639 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244044</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the denial of CENVAT Credit for services used in trading activities and for credit distributed by an unregistered Input Service Distributor (ISD). The appellant was found to have availed ineligible CENVAT Credit and was directed to make a pre-deposit to stay the recovery of the balance dues during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 639 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244044</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the denial of CENVAT Credit for services used in trading activities and for credit distributed by an unregistered Input Service Distributor (ISD). The appellant was found to have availed ineligible CENVAT Credit and was directed to make a pre-deposit to stay the recovery of the balance dues during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>