<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 638 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244043</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals challenging Orders-in-Original on excise duty liability for footwear manufacturing. The appellants failed to prove their claims of receiving pre-packed shoes, leading to the duty demands being upheld. The Tribunal considered the activity as manufacturing under the Central Excise Act, 1944, concluding that the appellants&#039; actions warranted the imposition of excise duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2014 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 638 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244043</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals challenging Orders-in-Original on excise duty liability for footwear manufacturing. The appellants failed to prove their claims of receiving pre-packed shoes, leading to the duty demands being upheld. The Tribunal considered the activity as manufacturing under the Central Excise Act, 1944, concluding that the appellants&#039; actions warranted the imposition of excise duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>