<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 653 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162079</link>
    <description>The revisional authority could reopen a final assessment under the State Act read with the Central Act where a later judicial pronouncement constituted valid information, and the limitation bar was saved by the proviso for revision based on a court decision. The revision power extended to correcting assessments that had become final, so the challenge to reopening failed. On classification, twisting wire strands into electricity conductors produced a distinct commercial commodity with a different end use, so the conductors were not treated as wires for the concessional notification. Both issues were decided in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:42:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 653 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162079</link>
      <description>The revisional authority could reopen a final assessment under the State Act read with the Central Act where a later judicial pronouncement constituted valid information, and the limitation bar was saved by the proviso for revision based on a court decision. The revision power extended to correcting assessments that had become final, so the challenge to reopening failed. On classification, twisting wire strands into electricity conductors produced a distinct commercial commodity with a different end use, so the conductors were not treated as wires for the concessional notification. Both issues were decided in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>