https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162068 The court found that the decision made by a person who had previously represented the Government of Andhra Pradesh in a case before the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal was biased. The court concluded that the order was vitiated by bias and directed the matter to be heard afresh by another Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes to ensure impartiality. The court emphasized the importance of avoiding any appearance of bias to maintain public confidence in the judicial process. en-us Fri, 19 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Feb 2014 14:21:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162068 The court found that the decision made by a person who had previously represented the Government of Andhra Pradesh in a case before the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal was biased. The court concluded that the order was vitiated by bias and directed the matter to be heard afresh by another Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes to ensure impartiality. The court emphasized the importance of avoiding any appearance of bias to maintain public confidence in the judicial process. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 19 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162068