https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162067 Proposition notices issued to reopen concluded assessments under section 12-A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 were not interfered with in writ jurisdiction because they only required the assessees to explain their position on alleged escaped turnover and the scope of an exemption notification. The Court held that it was premature at the notice stage to finally decide the factual classification of the goods or the extent of the notification against the charging entry. Available statutory remedies, including objections, revised returns, appeals and revisions, were sufficient, and the notices did not by themselves infringe article 19(1)(g). en-us Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Feb 2014 14:18:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162067 Proposition notices issued to reopen concluded assessments under section 12-A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 were not interfered with in writ jurisdiction because they only required the assessees to explain their position on alleged escaped turnover and the scope of an exemption notification. The Court held that it was premature at the notice stage to finally decide the factual classification of the goods or the extent of the notification against the charging entry. Available statutory remedies, including objections, revised returns, appeals and revisions, were sufficient, and the notices did not by themselves infringe article 19(1)(g). Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162067