<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 603 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244008</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in a tax case involving interpretation of section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, confirming the non-applicability of section 194C for TDS deduction on payments to foreign shipping companies or their agents. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the Bill of Lading in determining the nature of the carrier as a Non-Resident Company. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the addition for payments made to legal agents, rejecting arguments based on a Special Bench Decision and subsequent judgments. The orders passed by the CIT(A) were affirmed, providing detailed analysis on legal provisions and circulars.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 06:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 603 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244008</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in a tax case involving interpretation of section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, confirming the non-applicability of section 194C for TDS deduction on payments to foreign shipping companies or their agents. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the Bill of Lading in determining the nature of the carrier as a Non-Resident Company. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the addition for payments made to legal agents, rejecting arguments based on a Special Bench Decision and subsequent judgments. The orders passed by the CIT(A) were affirmed, providing detailed analysis on legal provisions and circulars.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>