https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243997 The Tribunal found the appellant in violation of Rule 8 (3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 for utilizing Cenvat Credit during a default period, contrary to statutory provisions. While accepting the appellant's argument on duty demand computation, the Tribunal directed a pre-deposit of Rs. 2.22 crore through PLA within eight weeks. Compliance would lead to waiver of the balance dues, stay on recovery during appeal, and allowance for credit in the Cenvat Credit account, striking a balance between legal obligations and the appellant's financial constraints. en-us Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 May 2015 18:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243997 The Tribunal found the appellant in violation of Rule 8 (3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 for utilizing Cenvat Credit during a default period, contrary to statutory provisions. While accepting the appellant's argument on duty demand computation, the Tribunal directed a pre-deposit of Rs. 2.22 crore through PLA within eight weeks. Compliance would lead to waiver of the balance dues, stay on recovery during appeal, and allowance for credit in the Cenvat Credit account, striking a balance between legal obligations and the appellant's financial constraints. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243997