<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 590 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243995</link>
    <description>Export of capital goods under bond without payment of duty, where CENVAT credit had been taken, was treated as supported by Board circulars of 1996 and 2000 and by prior Tribunal authority. On that basis, the appellant was held to have established a strong prima facie case for interim protection against recovery of the demanded credit. Unconditional waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of the adjudged dues was stayed during pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2014 15:55:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 590 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243995</link>
      <description>Export of capital goods under bond without payment of duty, where CENVAT credit had been taken, was treated as supported by Board circulars of 1996 and 2000 and by prior Tribunal authority. On that basis, the appellant was held to have established a strong prima facie case for interim protection against recovery of the demanded credit. Unconditional waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of the adjudged dues was stayed during pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>