<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 588 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243993</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Applicant failed to prove grounds for a full waiver of the duty, interest, and penalty imposed. The Tribunal ordered the Applicant to make a predeposit of 25% of the duty within a specified period. Upon compliance, the remaining dues would be waived, and recovery stayed during the appeal process. Failure to meet the deposit requirement would result in the dismissal of the appeal without further notice. The decision was based on the Commissioner&#039;s detailed findings that the Applicant was involved in manufacturing excisable goods without paying central excise duty, supported by statements and evidence from key personnel and departments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 06:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 588 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243993</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Applicant failed to prove grounds for a full waiver of the duty, interest, and penalty imposed. The Tribunal ordered the Applicant to make a predeposit of 25% of the duty within a specified period. Upon compliance, the remaining dues would be waived, and recovery stayed during the appeal process. Failure to meet the deposit requirement would result in the dismissal of the appeal without further notice. The decision was based on the Commissioner&#039;s detailed findings that the Applicant was involved in manufacturing excisable goods without paying central excise duty, supported by statements and evidence from key personnel and departments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>