<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 582 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243987</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the imposition of penalties under Section 11AC on the company due to substantial shortages and evidence of clandestine activities. Penalties under Rule 26 were also imposed on the Director for his involvement in the irregularities. The Tribunal found the Revenue&#039;s appeal acceptable, modifying the Commissioner (Appeals) order to impose penalties on both the company and the Director.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 06:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 582 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243987</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the imposition of penalties under Section 11AC on the company due to substantial shortages and evidence of clandestine activities. Penalties under Rule 26 were also imposed on the Director for his involvement in the irregularities. The Tribunal found the Revenue&#039;s appeal acceptable, modifying the Commissioner (Appeals) order to impose penalties on both the company and the Director.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>