<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 498 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243986</link>
    <description>The transfer pricing adjustment on freight receipts and freight payments was rejected because the freight arrangement was found to reflect arm&#039;s length conditions. The record showed that the overseas entities on both sides performed similar functions, used comparable assets and assumed comparable risks, and the freight revenue and expense were shared equally after transportation costs in both countries. As the Revenue did not dislodge this comparable profile, the 50:50 profit split was accepted as commercially justified and there was no basis for the proposed addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2014 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 498 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243986</link>
      <description>The transfer pricing adjustment on freight receipts and freight payments was rejected because the freight arrangement was found to reflect arm&#039;s length conditions. The record showed that the overseas entities on both sides performed similar functions, used comparable assets and assumed comparable risks, and the freight revenue and expense were shared equally after transportation costs in both countries. As the Revenue did not dislodge this comparable profile, the 50:50 profit split was accepted as commercially justified and there was no basis for the proposed addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>