<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 443 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162054</link>
    <description>A sales tax exemption tied to a statutory notification ceased to apply once the notification was amended to place the relevant manufacturing process in the negative list from 15 January 1998. The exemption continued only up to 14 January 1998, because the Government retained power under the enabling provision to vary or cancel the notification. A departmental exemption order and eligibility certificate could not override the amended statutory notification, and promissory estoppel could not be used to preserve a tax concession contrary to the statute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:44:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 443 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162054</link>
      <description>A sales tax exemption tied to a statutory notification ceased to apply once the notification was amended to place the relevant manufacturing process in the negative list from 15 January 1998. The exemption continued only up to 14 January 1998, because the Government retained power under the enabling provision to vary or cancel the notification. A departmental exemption order and eligibility certificate could not override the amended statutory notification, and promissory estoppel could not be used to preserve a tax concession contrary to the statute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>