<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 916 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162052</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the single Judge&#039;s decision and granting the appellant reinstatement with back wages. The discrepancy between the criminal acquittal and the departmental charges led to the Court emphasizing the relevance of the criminal judgment in the industrial dispute. The Court remitted the case to the Industrial Tribunal for quantification of back wages, ensuring alignment with the appellant&#039;s entitlements following the criminal acquittal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 13:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 916 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162052</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the single Judge&#039;s decision and granting the appellant reinstatement with back wages. The discrepancy between the criminal acquittal and the departmental charges led to the Court emphasizing the relevance of the criminal judgment in the industrial dispute. The Court remitted the case to the Industrial Tribunal for quantification of back wages, ensuring alignment with the appellant&#039;s entitlements following the criminal acquittal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>