<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 557 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162049</link>
    <description>Amounts deposited during the pendency of an appeal under an interim court order, when not referable to any admitted tax liability, are treated as excess payment rather than tax due under section 29(1) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948. The provision requires refund of tax, fee or other sums paid in excess of the amount legally due, and amounts paid before final assessment cannot be retained as dues payable under the Act. On that basis, refund was held to be available for the sums paid under interim directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:31:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 557 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162049</link>
      <description>Amounts deposited during the pendency of an appeal under an interim court order, when not referable to any admitted tax liability, are treated as excess payment rather than tax due under section 29(1) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948. The provision requires refund of tax, fee or other sums paid in excess of the amount legally due, and amounts paid before final assessment cannot be retained as dues payable under the Act. On that basis, refund was held to be available for the sums paid under interim directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>