https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162028 Writ interference against an interlocutory order refusing stay of disputed tax collection was declined because the authority had considered the material, found no prima facie case for applying the relevant sales tax provision, and gave a reasoned determination. The order was treated as interlocutory and not as one creating an irreversible situation or taking away any valuable right. In the absence of manifest error or irreversible prejudice, no basis existed for intervention under Article 226. The challenge to the refusal of stay therefore failed and the stay order was left undisturbed. en-us Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:43:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162028 Writ interference against an interlocutory order refusing stay of disputed tax collection was declined because the authority had considered the material, found no prima facie case for applying the relevant sales tax provision, and gave a reasoned determination. The order was treated as interlocutory and not as one creating an irreversible situation or taking away any valuable right. In the absence of manifest error or irreversible prejudice, no basis existed for intervention under Article 226. The challenge to the refusal of stay therefore failed and the stay order was left undisturbed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162028