https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162026 A dismissal based on findings unsupported by any legal evidence is perverse and vitiated by non-application of mind, so the award sustaining it could not stand. The alleged misconduct of misappropriation, fabricated accounts, bogus cheques and conspiracy was not proved by evidence, and the employee's failure to keep a private cheque book locked did not by itself establish misconduct. Once the dismissal was set aside, reinstatement followed as the normal relief, and full back wages and consequential benefits were warranted because the employer failed to prove gainful employment during the period of forced unemployment. en-us Thu, 27 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Jul 2014 18:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162026 A dismissal based on findings unsupported by any legal evidence is perverse and vitiated by non-application of mind, so the award sustaining it could not stand. The alleged misconduct of misappropriation, fabricated accounts, bogus cheques and conspiracy was not proved by evidence, and the employee's failure to keep a private cheque book locked did not by itself establish misconduct. Once the dismissal was set aside, reinstatement followed as the normal relief, and full back wages and consequential benefits were warranted because the employer failed to prove gainful employment during the period of forced unemployment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 27 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162026