https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162021 The correction power for clerical or accidental slips cannot be used to review an award on merits, but it may supply an omitted consequential direction that was part of the original reference. Where misconduct is proved and dismissal is only substituted by a lesser penalty, back wages, continuity of service and similar consequential benefits do not automatically follow; they are reserved for exceptional cases such as complete exoneration or victimisation. Interference with dismissal is justified only if the punishment is shockingly disproportionate, which was not shown here. Non-implementation of reinstatement without stay did not cure the substantive defect in the modified award. The dismissal was therefore upheld and the modified award could not stand. en-us Thu, 01 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162021 The correction power for clerical or accidental slips cannot be used to review an award on merits, but it may supply an omitted consequential direction that was part of the original reference. Where misconduct is proved and dismissal is only substituted by a lesser penalty, back wages, continuity of service and similar consequential benefits do not automatically follow; they are reserved for exceptional cases such as complete exoneration or victimisation. Interference with dismissal is justified only if the punishment is shockingly disproportionate, which was not shown here. Non-implementation of reinstatement without stay did not cure the substantive defect in the modified award. The dismissal was therefore upheld and the modified award could not stand. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 01 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162021