<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 694 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162017</link>
    <description>Plastic water tanks were treated as containers for sales tax classification under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, so they fell within entry 19 covering packing material and containers rather than entry 187 for articles of plastics. The Court relied on prior treatment of similar plastic goods as containers and rejected the view that storage use took the tanks outside that entry. It also reiterated that an alternative appellate remedy is not an absolute bar to writ jurisdiction under Article 226, and that writ relief may still be granted where the impugned assessment order is manifestly erroneous. On that basis, the assessment orders were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:47:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 694 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162017</link>
      <description>Plastic water tanks were treated as containers for sales tax classification under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, so they fell within entry 19 covering packing material and containers rather than entry 187 for articles of plastics. The Court relied on prior treatment of similar plastic goods as containers and rejected the view that storage use took the tanks outside that entry. It also reiterated that an alternative appellate remedy is not an absolute bar to writ jurisdiction under Article 226, and that writ relief may still be granted where the impugned assessment order is manifestly erroneous. On that basis, the assessment orders were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>