https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162015 A disciplinary authority cannot dispense with a departmental inquiry under Rule 19(ii) of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 unless it records a finding that holding the inquiry is not reasonably practicable; absent that foundational determination, the dismissal could not stand. Back wages are not an automatic consequence of setting aside dismissal and depend on the facts, with the employee first required to plead and show that he was not gainfully employed before the employer rebuts that claim. As no such pleading or material was placed, full back wages were unsustainable, and the relief was confined accordingly. en-us Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162015 A disciplinary authority cannot dispense with a departmental inquiry under Rule 19(ii) of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 unless it records a finding that holding the inquiry is not reasonably practicable; absent that foundational determination, the dismissal could not stand. Back wages are not an automatic consequence of setting aside dismissal and depend on the facts, with the employee first required to plead and show that he was not gainfully employed before the employer rebuts that claim. As no such pleading or material was placed, full back wages were unsustainable, and the relief was confined accordingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162015