<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 693 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162014</link>
    <description>Revisional power under section 22-A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act could be exercised only in relation to orders or proceedings passed under sections 20 or 21. Because the assessment was made under section 5-B and the refund approval was granted by the Joint Commissioner, neither order fell within that revisional ambit; the Additional Commissioner therefore acted without inherent jurisdiction, and the revisional order was void ab initio and quashed. Section 24-A, which bars belated objections only as to territorial or pecuniary jurisdiction, did not prevent the assessee from challenging a fundamental lack of jurisdiction for the first time in appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:39:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 693 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162014</link>
      <description>Revisional power under section 22-A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act could be exercised only in relation to orders or proceedings passed under sections 20 or 21. Because the assessment was made under section 5-B and the refund approval was granted by the Joint Commissioner, neither order fell within that revisional ambit; the Additional Commissioner therefore acted without inherent jurisdiction, and the revisional order was void ab initio and quashed. Section 24-A, which bars belated objections only as to territorial or pecuniary jurisdiction, did not prevent the assessee from challenging a fundamental lack of jurisdiction for the first time in appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>