https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162009 A workman who has actually worked for 240 days in the preceding twelve months satisfies the continuous service requirement under Section 25-B for protection under Section 25-F, and termination without notice, wages in lieu of notice, and retrenchment compensation is illegal retrenchment; the finding of invalid termination was therefore upheld. Back wages are not automatic on a finding of illegal termination and depend on factors such as the nature and length of employment, interruptions in service, and delay in raising the dispute. On the facts, the award of 50% back wages was unsustainable and was set aside, while reinstatement with continuity of service remained undisturbed. en-us Thu, 14 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Jun 2014 11:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162009 A workman who has actually worked for 240 days in the preceding twelve months satisfies the continuous service requirement under Section 25-B for protection under Section 25-F, and termination without notice, wages in lieu of notice, and retrenchment compensation is illegal retrenchment; the finding of invalid termination was therefore upheld. Back wages are not automatic on a finding of illegal termination and depend on factors such as the nature and length of employment, interruptions in service, and delay in raising the dispute. On the facts, the award of 50% back wages was unsustainable and was set aside, while reinstatement with continuity of service remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162009