<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 468 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162008</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, directing reinstatement of the employee and emphasizing the discretionary nature of awarding full back wages. Factors such as lack of challenge to termination order, delays in payment, and findings of lack of aptitude were considered. The Court ordered the appellants to pay an additional sum within a specified time frame, with interest accruing until payment. The importance of considering all relevant circumstances in determining back wages upon reinstatement was highlighted to ensure justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 468 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162008</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, directing reinstatement of the employee and emphasizing the discretionary nature of awarding full back wages. Factors such as lack of challenge to termination order, delays in payment, and findings of lack of aptitude were considered. The Court ordered the appellants to pay an additional sum within a specified time frame, with interest accruing until payment. The importance of considering all relevant circumstances in determining back wages upon reinstatement was highlighted to ensure justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>