<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 862 - Central Administrative Tribunal</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161996</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of back wages and suspension allowance to the applicant based on the inapplicability of the office order dated 24.11.1954 to his case and established legal principles from previous judgments. The applicant&#039;s challenge was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of individual conduct and circumstances in determining entitlement to back wages following a period of conviction and incarceration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2016 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 862 - Central Administrative Tribunal</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161996</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of back wages and suspension allowance to the applicant based on the inapplicability of the office order dated 24.11.1954 to his case and established legal principles from previous judgments. The applicant&#039;s challenge was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of individual conduct and circumstances in determining entitlement to back wages following a period of conviction and incarceration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>