https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161992 Back wages were not automatic after reinstatement where dismissal from service had been based on conviction for a serious offence and the employee was later acquitted. The Court held that the claim had to be assessed independently on the surrounding facts, including the employee's conduct and whether he was wrongly kept out of service. As the employee's own involvement in the crime had prevented him from rendering service during the relevant period, the later acquittal did not, by itself, justify payment of back wages. The employee was therefore held not entitled to back wages. en-us Mon, 28 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161992 Back wages were not automatic after reinstatement where dismissal from service had been based on conviction for a serious offence and the employee was later acquitted. The Court held that the claim had to be assessed independently on the surrounding facts, including the employee's conduct and whether he was wrongly kept out of service. As the employee's own involvement in the crime had prevented him from rendering service during the relevant period, the later acquittal did not, by itself, justify payment of back wages. The employee was therefore held not entitled to back wages. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 28 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161992