<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 557 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243960</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal for AY 2004-05, restricting the disallowance of interest to the excess above 15%. However, the appeal for AY 2007-08 was dismissed, upholding the addition of unexplained investment as the funds were used for non-business purposes. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of utilizing borrowed funds for business purposes to claim deductions under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 07:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 557 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243960</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal for AY 2004-05, restricting the disallowance of interest to the excess above 15%. However, the appeal for AY 2007-08 was dismissed, upholding the addition of unexplained investment as the funds were used for non-business purposes. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of utilizing borrowed funds for business purposes to claim deductions under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>