<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 555 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243958</link>
    <description>Advertisement-film production costs were treated as revenue expenditure, following earlier years&#039; Tribunal orders and deleting the disallowance. MODVAT-related closing-stock adjustment under section 145A was remanded for fresh adjudication with corresponding opening-stock relief. Ad hoc disallowances of travelling expenses were deleted for lack of specific defects, while professional sponsorship and free-samples expenses were restricted to 2% each. Depreciation on testing equipment used in laboratories and hospitals was allowed as business use was accepted. Transfer-pricing adjustments on royalty, tax, service tax and R&amp;D cess were deleted because the payments were supported by agreements and approvals. An ad hoc adjustment to publicity and sales-promotion expenses was also rejected because arm&#039;s length price must be determined under a prescribed method.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 07:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 555 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243958</link>
      <description>Advertisement-film production costs were treated as revenue expenditure, following earlier years&#039; Tribunal orders and deleting the disallowance. MODVAT-related closing-stock adjustment under section 145A was remanded for fresh adjudication with corresponding opening-stock relief. Ad hoc disallowances of travelling expenses were deleted for lack of specific defects, while professional sponsorship and free-samples expenses were restricted to 2% each. Depreciation on testing equipment used in laboratories and hospitals was allowed as business use was accepted. Transfer-pricing adjustments on royalty, tax, service tax and R&amp;D cess were deleted because the payments were supported by agreements and approvals. An ad hoc adjustment to publicity and sales-promotion expenses was also rejected because arm&#039;s length price must be determined under a prescribed method.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>