<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 551 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243954</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to not impose a penalty under Section 11AC but reversed the Tribunal&#039;s ruling on interest. It reinstated the adjudicating authority&#039;s order, requiring payment of interest as per Rule 14 and Section 11AB. The court emphasized strict adherence to statutory provisions and the need to address substantial legal questions regardless of the monetary amount involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 551 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243954</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to not impose a penalty under Section 11AC but reversed the Tribunal&#039;s ruling on interest. It reinstated the adjudicating authority&#039;s order, requiring payment of interest as per Rule 14 and Section 11AB. The court emphasized strict adherence to statutory provisions and the need to address substantial legal questions regardless of the monetary amount involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>