<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 545 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243948</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the interest liability on the CENVAT credit taken by the appellant from the date of taking the credit until its reversal. However, since the credit had already been reversed, the demand for the same credit was not sustained. The penalties and fines imposed on the appellant were also set aside. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 545 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243948</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the interest liability on the CENVAT credit taken by the appellant from the date of taking the credit until its reversal. However, since the credit had already been reversed, the demand for the same credit was not sustained. The penalties and fines imposed on the appellant were also set aside. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>