<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 542 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243945</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Commissioner failed to adhere to directions for cross-examination of witnesses, leading to a dispute over dropping the request for cross-examination. Despite a significant delay in completing the adjudication process, the appellants were granted the opportunity to cross-examine the remaining witnesses. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner for prompt re-adjudication, emphasizing the importance of following Tribunal directions, upholding the right to cross-examine witnesses, and ensuring timely resolution of legal matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 06:25:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=345900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 542 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243945</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Commissioner failed to adhere to directions for cross-examination of witnesses, leading to a dispute over dropping the request for cross-examination. Despite a significant delay in completing the adjudication process, the appellants were granted the opportunity to cross-examine the remaining witnesses. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner for prompt re-adjudication, emphasizing the importance of following Tribunal directions, upholding the right to cross-examine witnesses, and ensuring timely resolution of legal matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>