https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243939 The High Court dismissed the review application as the alleged error did not qualify as an error apparent on the face of the record. The decision emphasized the limited scope of review jurisdiction in correcting legal judgments, distinguishing between reviewable errors and mere erroneous decisions. en-us Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243939 The High Court dismissed the review application as the alleged error did not qualify as an error apparent on the face of the record. The decision emphasized the limited scope of review jurisdiction in correcting legal judgments, distinguishing between reviewable errors and mere erroneous decisions. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243939